A Goat in Panda’s Clothing – The WWF SHAM!

The deeper you dig, the more problems you uncover!

“WWF beds with Monsanto to steal public lands, promote GM crops”

“We need to start focusing on the food production. It takes 15 years to bring a genetically engineered product to market. The clock is ticking. We need to get moving.” ~Dr Jason Clay, Senior Vice President, World Wildlife Fund, 2010.

So, the WWF is supporting GMO’s? What else is it up to? You really need to inform yourselves!

There is more information on the Food Freedom News site:-

Millions Against Monsanto: The Food Fight of Our Lives

Monsanto threatens to sue Vermont if GMO food label bill passes

Want to do something positive?

Go to “The California Ballot Initiative: Standing Up to Monsanto”

and inform yourselves, then support the California GMO Labeling Ballot Initiative here:-

If you still have time, you could look at “Monsanto and Genetically Modified Crops – Is there a cover-up?”

Even the Russians are aware of the problem!

And just in case you thought it was only the crops that are a problem, think again! Monsanto, which brought us Agent Orange, is now flooding arable land with Roundup – a close cousin. Apart from killing plants, what does Roundup do? Look here:-

“Roundup herbicide can alter morphology of animals – new study”

and that is in addition to the affects that it has on humans. Google for these – they are easy enough to find!

With GMO’s we certainly are going to have our hands full.

PS. On May 29, 2012, the following article appeared in Speigel:-
WWF Helps Industry More than Environment
Please read it for more information.


4 thoughts on “A Goat in Panda’s Clothing – The WWF SHAM!”

  1. I believe you have mentioned some very interesting points , appreciate it for the post.

  2. Hi there, I discovered your site by means of Google even as looking for a related matter, your site got here up, it seems good. I’ve bookmarked to my favourites|added to bookmarks.

  3. Hey: many thanks for getting the time of composing up this knowledge. I normally make an attempt to additionally my knowledge of issues. No matter if I agree or disagree, I really like specifics. I consider the previous days when the only supply of details was the library or the newspaper. They the two look so old fashion. Please excuse my bad grammar : )

Comments are closed.